Comments for codename30 http://codename30.com a weblog by Railsways.com Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:13:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 Comment on Generating rails app in previous version after rails 3.0 beta by medwezys http://codename30.com/2010/02/22/generating-rails-app-in-previous-version-after-rails-3-0-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-336 medwezys Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:13:24 +0000 http://codename30.com/?p=72#comment-336 <p>Thanks, that was simple yet very helpful :)</p> Thanks, that was simple yet very helpful :)

]]> Comment on RoR 2.3.4 didn’t work well with Ruby 1.9 by codename30 » Blog Archive » Rails 2.3.5 Released http://codename30.com/2009/09/10/rails-2-3-4-didnt-work-well-with-ruby-1-9/comment-page-1/#comment-166 codename30 » Blog Archive » Rails 2.3.5 Released Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:04:33 +0000 http://codename30.com/?p=26#comment-166 <p>[...] new version of Rails is released, Rails 2.3.5 fixed the incompatibility issues with Ruby 1.9 found in Rails 2.3.4, with Rails 2.3.5, you are not required to patch Rails if you develop your webapp using Ruby 1.9, [...]</p> [...] new version of Rails is released, Rails 2.3.5 fixed the incompatibility issues with Ruby 1.9 found in Rails 2.3.4, with Rails 2.3.5, you are not required to patch Rails if you develop your webapp using Ruby 1.9, [...]

]]>